Saturday, May 26, 2012
DUI Accidents
Sometimes a DUI is bad enough, but couple that with an accident and you have double trouble. DUI collisions are common, many involve simple property damage but some result in injury. A common question by folks that have been arrested for drunk driving after an accident is how do California DUI Laws treat people that have not only commit driving under the influence but cause an accident as well? The short answer is that the laws do not create any greater punishment per se unless someone is hurt. However, many prosecutors will want a larger pond of flesh for a person charged with DWI and also crashes.
Sunday, May 20, 2012
A Follow-Up to California Laws on DUI Drugs (DUID)
With the recent cases dealing with DUI arrests and breath test cases with a breath test results of .00%, there has been a litany of questions how a prosecutor can file drunk driving charges in these types of cases. It's simple. VC23152a says that a person can be charged with full DUI for drugs only, no alcohol is needed. Therefore, if a blood or urine test shows some drug that has impairing effects and that drug can be corroborated by the cop who made the arrest, a DUID charge will be pursued. With that in mind, it does not automatically mean that a conviction will occur. There may exist many defenses to the case that a lawyer can help develop. DUID Attorney Matthew Ruff for example tells us that under the influence of drug cases can often be difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Most drugs do not have a per se level of impairment and so that will hinder many criminal prosecutions in Court. Prescription drugs are particularly hard to quantify impairment levels. One thing is clear California DUI Laws do allow a D.A. to file charges and they will, so get a law firm that knows the ins and outs of DUID.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
Can Amanda Bynes Be Charged For DUI With A .00% BAC?
In the news this week is the arrest of Amanda Bynes for DUI in Los Angeles. However, her father is not just standing by his daughter in the aftermath of her DUI arrest on Friday. He says there is no way she was drunk that night. "She was not drunk," Rick Bynes told People. "I'm told she blew a zero on the Breathalyzer. She didn't have a single drink. My daughter doesn't drink." The elder Bynes claims the police officer that detained his daughter was at fault for pulling out in front of the actress as she was turning at an intersection. While she was arrested for DUI after side-swiping the cop, Rick adamantly says his daughter was not impaired, just extremely "upset and very emotional." So, how is this possible? One possibility is that she was under the influence of drugs, either prescription or illegal drugs. California Law allows a police officer to arrest a person for DUI if the individual was impaired due to alcohol or drugs or both. Time will tell whether the evidence supports a charge of DWI or that the officer was simply mistaken.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Understanding the HGN Test in California DUI Cases
The horizontal gaze nystagmus test (HGN) is often the first field sobriety test administered in a California DUI investigation. Customarily, the police officer does not need probable cause to arrest before requesting a driver to perform a field sobriety test such as an HGN. The biggest source of error on the HGN is the failure of the officer to properly administer the test. Indeed, there are at least 25 different steps that need to be performed to properly conduct the HGN test. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration training manual says that the procedures must be followed with precision and that failure to do so renders the results unreliable. In a DUI trial the jury should be made aware that the tests are standardized field sobriety tests—not randomized field sobriety excursions. It must be explained to the jury that an agency of the federal government (NHTSA) has established that the tests must be given in a particular manner or they are not reliable. No freelancing is permitted. Even if the officer administered the HGN test flawlessly, the test is still subject to attack. In fact, HGN can be caused by a number of reasons other than alcohol intoxication. HGN occurs naturally in some people who are not under the influence. Also, fatigue, illness, hypertension, and common drugs like caffeine or aspirin may contribute to HGN.
Friday, April 27, 2012
What Are the Exceptions to the IID Requirement in California?
The DUI laws in Los Angeles California require the installation of an ignition interlock on all vehicles owned by a person convicted of a DUI. The question is often asked, how do you I get around this requirement? There is a possible exemption from compliance with this pilot program if within 30 days of the notification of the IID requirement, the person certifies to the department all of the following:
• The person does not own a vehicle.
• The person does not have access to a vehicle at his or her residence.
• The person no longer has access to the vehicle being driven by the person at the time of arrest for a violation that subsequently resulted in a conviction for a violation of VC §23152 or VC §23153.
• The person acknowledges that he or she is only allowed to drive a vehicle that is fitted with a functioning ignition interlock device.
• The person acknowledges that he or she is required to have a valid driver license before he or she can drive.
• The person is subject to the requirements of this section
When he or she purchases or has access to a vehicle. Installation of an IID device on car(s) does not allow the person to drive without a valid driver license. For the purposes of this pilot program, vehicle does not include a motorcycle until the state certifi es an IID that can be installed on a motorcycle. Further, a person subject to an IID restriction shall not operate a motorcycle for the duration of the IID restriction period.
• The person does not own a vehicle.
• The person does not have access to a vehicle at his or her residence.
• The person no longer has access to the vehicle being driven by the person at the time of arrest for a violation that subsequently resulted in a conviction for a violation of VC §23152 or VC §23153.
• The person acknowledges that he or she is only allowed to drive a vehicle that is fitted with a functioning ignition interlock device.
• The person acknowledges that he or she is required to have a valid driver license before he or she can drive.
• The person is subject to the requirements of this section
When he or she purchases or has access to a vehicle. Installation of an IID device on car(s) does not allow the person to drive without a valid driver license. For the purposes of this pilot program, vehicle does not include a motorcycle until the state certifi es an IID that can be installed on a motorcycle. Further, a person subject to an IID restriction shall not operate a motorcycle for the duration of the IID restriction period.
How Do California DUI Laws Treat Commercial Drivers?
DUI Laws in general tend to slam a person charged and convicted with drunk driving, however, when you are a commercial driver it gets even more evil. In addition to any other penalties, if a driver of a commercial motor vehicle violates Vehicle Code 23152(a), (b), (c), or (d) or section 23153(a), (b) or (d) while driving any vehicle, and the court notifies the DMV of this fact, the DMV must disqualify that driver from driving a commercial motor vehicle for one year. (VC 15300(a)(1)–(4), 15320). If the driver is convicted of a second DUI violation, the California DMV will impose a lifetime ban on that driver’s right to drive a commercial motor vehicle.
What about when a refusal is alleged as part of the DUI? In refusal cases, in addition to any other penalties, if a driver of a commercial motor vehicle willfully refuses to submit to, or fails to complete, a chemical test to determine his or her blood-alcohol content in connection to the driving of any vehicle, the DMV must disqualify that driver from driving a commercial motor vehicle for one year. A driver’s second refusal will result in a lifetime ban on his or her right to drive a commercial motor vehicle.
What about when a refusal is alleged as part of the DUI? In refusal cases, in addition to any other penalties, if a driver of a commercial motor vehicle willfully refuses to submit to, or fails to complete, a chemical test to determine his or her blood-alcohol content in connection to the driving of any vehicle, the DMV must disqualify that driver from driving a commercial motor vehicle for one year. A driver’s second refusal will result in a lifetime ban on his or her right to drive a commercial motor vehicle.
Thursday, April 26, 2012
California DUI Impoundment Laws
A little known punishment relating to a DUI is the impoundment or actual sale of a defendant's car upon conviction of a drunk driving offense. Though the California DUI Laws are some of the most stringent in the nation, the penalty is not often imposed, at least in the larger counties, largely due to to the logistical issues involved. Under the California Vehicle Code, the court may order that a vehicle that was used in the commission of an offense of DUI, and was registered to the convicted defendant, be impounded at the defendant’s expense for one to 30 days if the defendant has not had a prior conviction within the last five years. If the defendant has had a prior conviction within the last five years, the court must order impoundment of the vehicle at the defendant’s expense for one to 30 days, except in an unusual case. If the defendant has had two or more prior convictions within the last five years, the court must order impoundment of the vehicle at the defendant’s expense for one to 90 days.
If the accused is convicted of DUI and has two or more separate convictions within seven years, or is convicted of DUI with injury and has any separate convictions within the same period, the court may declare the vehicle a nuisance and order it to be sold, as long as the defendant is the registered owner under CA Vehicle Code §23596. However, according to one Hermosa Beach Dui Attorney, the court may not order impoundment or sale if the defendant’s spouse has a community property interest in the vehicle, the vehicle requires only a class C or a class M license, and the vehicle is the sole vehicle available to the defendant’s family. (Courtesy, CA Jud. Bch Guide)
If the accused is convicted of DUI and has two or more separate convictions within seven years, or is convicted of DUI with injury and has any separate convictions within the same period, the court may declare the vehicle a nuisance and order it to be sold, as long as the defendant is the registered owner under CA Vehicle Code §23596. However, according to one Hermosa Beach Dui Attorney, the court may not order impoundment or sale if the defendant’s spouse has a community property interest in the vehicle, the vehicle requires only a class C or a class M license, and the vehicle is the sole vehicle available to the defendant’s family. (Courtesy, CA Jud. Bch Guide)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)